This analysis uses accidental/undetermined opioid-detected overdose data from the Connecticut Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.
The vast majority of decedents are either white, Black or Latine. There is limited information available on the race/ethnicity of other decedents, so they are listed as “other”.
CT OCME captures limited information about trans decedents, seemingly from hrt scripts and possibly other scene information/witness statements. Please note that this is almost certainly an undercount of the actual number of trans decedents, since OCME only captures sex by visual inspection and would require witness statements to get information about gender. Even though “MtF” and other trans designators present in the data are not related to sex, I are presenting them for the sake of not obscuring data about trans people and otherwise list this variable as “sex” since OCME seeks to capture sex, not gender. In recent years, OCME has debuted an “X” value for sex which seems to function as a catch-all designator for trans/nonbinary people.
I create these graphs by combining the information present in the “race” and “sex” variables.
The red lines on the plots represent modes. The distribution has multiple peaks – each peak suggests that specific age groups are more likely to die than others. More information about the age distribution, including a better look at these multiple modes and peaks, will be available in an upcoming publication. I exclude modes generated from clusters of ~10 deaths of either very old or very young decedents.
While there isn’t a clear trend for fatal overdoses, it is worth noting that there are more nonfatal overdoses on Friday and Saturday [analysis done with DPH’s EMS data]. I do not see any trends in day of week for 2009-2017 either [data to be published].
I do not see trends in month of overdose for 2009-2017 either.
To see these images in better resolution, right click and “open in new tab.” It may be more useful to see the corresponding version of these graphs in your DMHAS region of interest.
I chose towns based on what regional harm reduction workers wanted and included, when I could, towns with overdose prevention infrastructure or towns with the most ODs in the past few years. I’m looking at instances where people who OD’d in a town didn’t live there [so they traveled to the town and OD’d there] – I am referring to this as “out-of-town ODs.”
## [1] "There were 11 instances where a person's residence town didn't match up with their injury town, out of 95 ODs in 2018 in region 1. This is 0.115789 of all ODs in this year."
## [1] "Here's a more in-depth look at out-of-town ODs in specific towns:"
## Town name Out-of-town ODs Total ODs Proportion of out-of-town ODs
## 1 Stamford 2 12 0.17
## 2 Norwalk 1 8 0.12
## [1] "There were 15 instances where a person's residence town didn't match up with their injury town, out of 109 ODs in 2019 in region 1. This is 0.137615. "
## [1] "Here's a more in-depth look at out-of-town ODs in specific towns:"
## Town name Out-of-town ODs Total ODs Proportion of out-of-town ODs
## 1 Stamford 1 6 0.17
## 2 Norwalk 0 13 0
## [1] "There were 19 instances where a person's residence town didn't match up with their injury town, out of 140 ODs in 2020 in region 1. This is 0.135714. "
## [1] "Here's a more in-depth look at out-of-town ODs in specific towns:"
## Town name Out-of-town ODs Total ODs Proportion of out-of-town ODs
## 1 Stamford 2 19 0.11
## 2 Norwalk 2 17 0.12
## [1] "There were 20 instances where a person's residence town didn't match up with their injury town, out of 147 ODs in 2021 in region 1. This is 0.136054. "
## [1] "Here's a more in-depth look at out-of-town ODs in specific towns:"
## Town name Out-of-town ODs Total ODs Proportion of out-of-town ODs
## 1 Stamford 3 21 0.14
## 2 Norwalk 1 13 0.08
## [1] "There were 18 instances where a person's residence town didn't match up with their injury town, out of 152 ODs in 2022 in region 1. This is 0.118421. "
## [1] "Here's a more in-depth look at out-of-town ODs in specific towns:"
## Town name Out-of-town ODs Total ODs Proportion of out-of-town ODs
## 1 Stamford 1 20 0.05
## 2 Norwalk 3 23 0.13
## [1] "There were 24 instances where a person's residence town didn't match up with their injury town, out of 162 ODs in 2023 where the injury and residence town were both known. This is 0.148148 of all such ODs in this year."
## [1] "Here's a more in-depth look at out-of-town ODs in specific towns:"
## Town name Out-of-town ODs Total ODs Percent of out-of-town ODs
## 1 Stamford 4 25 16
## 2 Norwalk 3 16 18.8
Please note that I have taken the original OCME data and aggregated the injury location categories somewhat [e.g. “wooded area” and “outdoors” are both listed under “outdoors”].
Most deaths occur in some sort of residence. I check to see how many deaths have the same injury and residence address, which would mean that the decedent died at home.
## [1] "There were 66 people who OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "The total proportion of decedents ODing in their own residence was 0.680412."
## [1] "Out of everyone who OD'd in a residence, 0.880000 of people OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "There were 78 people who OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "The proportion of decedents ODing in their own residence was 0.702703."
## [1] "Out of everyone who OD'd in a residence, 0.829787 of people OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "There were 103 people who OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "The proportion of decedents ODing in their own residence was 0.705479."
## [1] "Out of everyone who OD'd in a residence, 0.830645 of people OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "There were 109 people who OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "The proportion of decedents ODing in their own residence was 0.698718."
## [1] "Out of everyone who OD'd in a residence, 0.931624 of people OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "There were 118 people who OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "The proportion of decedents ODing in their own residence was 0.766234."
## [1] "Out of everyone who OD'd in a residence, 0.959350 of people OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "There were 111 people who OD'd in their own residence."
## [1] "The proportion of decedents ODing in their own residence was 0.664671."
## [1] "Out of everyone who OD'd in a residence, 0.798561 of people OD'd in their own residence."
Upon request, I am sharing the proportion of deaths with the following substances detected in tox: fentanyl, pharmaceutical opioids [there is a “pharma” category in the data], xylazine, alcohol and gabapentin/pregabalin. I combine gabapentin and pregabalin based on danbury’s recommendation since they are part of the same drug class. More tox data for 2009-2023 to be published in the future!
These are substance combinations found within the same decedent based on their tox report. “Other” is a catch-all category the OCME data uses to identify substances that are uncommon/not usually looked for in a tox report for an accidental overdose [e.g. benadryl, prescriptions for an unrelated condition].
## Rows: 5
## Columns: 31
## Groups: cocaine, combo..her.pharm.or.fent..OR.pharm.fent, heronly, pharmonly, fentonly, heroin, X6.mam, morphine, hermor_nocod, codeine, cod_w_no_hermor, di.H.codeine, hydromorphone, oxymorphone, hydrocodone, oxycodone, methadone, buprenorphine, fentanyl..4ANPP.too., Frankens, fent.or.frankens, tramadol, opioid.analogs..e.g...U47700., otherop, pharma_w_meth_no_fent.or.op.analogs.or.cod.or..other.op., pharma_nobupnometh, other, benzos, amphetamine [4]
## $ cocaine <int> 0, 1, 1, 1, 0
## $ combo..her.pharm.or.fent..OR.pharm.fent <int> 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
## $ heronly <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharmonly <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentonly <int> 1, 1, 1, 0, 1
## $ heroin <int> 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
## $ X6.mam <int> 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
## $ morphine <int> 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
## $ hermor_nocod <int> 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
## $ codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cod_w_no_hermor <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ di.H.codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ hydromorphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ oxymorphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ hydrocodone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ oxycodone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ methadone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ buprenorphine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentanyl..4ANPP.too. <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ Frankens <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 1
## $ fent.or.frankens <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ tramadol <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ opioid.analogs..e.g...U47700. <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ otherop <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma_w_meth_no_fent.or.op.analogs.or.cod.or..other.op. <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma_nobupnometh <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ other <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ benzos <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ amphetamine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ EtOH <int> 0, 0, 1, 0, 0
## $ n <int> 6, 4, 3, 3, 2
The top 5 substance combinations for 2018 are:
## Rows: 5
## Columns: 32
## Groups: xyla, combo, heronly, pharmonly, fentonly, Heroin, X6.mam, Morphine, hermor_nocod, Codeine, cod.w.no.hermor, di.H.codeine, Hydromorphone, oxymorphone, Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, Methadone, bup, fentanyl..4.ANPP.too., frankens, fent...frankens, tramadol, opioid.analogs..e.g...U47700., Other.Op, pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op, pharma_nobupnometh, other, benzos, cocaine, amphetamine [4]
## $ xyla <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ combo <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ heronly <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharmonly <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentonly <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ Heroin <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ X6.mam <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Morphine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ hermor_nocod <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cod.w.no.hermor <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ di.H.codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydromorphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ oxymorphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydrocodone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Oxycodone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Methadone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ bup <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentanyl..4.ANPP.too. <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ frankens <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent...frankens <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ tramadol <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ opioid.analogs..e.g...U47700. <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Other.Op <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma_nobupnometh <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ other <int> 0, 0, 1, 0, 1
## $ benzos <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 1
## $ cocaine <int> 0, 1, 1, 0, 0
## $ amphetamine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ EtOH <int> 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
## $ n <int> 5, 5, 4, 3, 3
The top 5 substance combinations for 2019 are:
## Rows: 5
## Columns: 31
## Groups: combo, heronly, pharmonly, fentonly, Heroin, X6.mam, Morphine, hermor_nocod, Codeine, cod.w.no.hermor, di.H.codeine, Hydromorphone, oxymorphone, Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, Methadone, bup, fentanyl..4.ANPP.too., frankens, fent...frankens, tramadol, opioid.analogs..e.g...U47700., Other.Op, pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op, pharma_nobupnometh, other, benzos, cocaine, amphetamine [3]
## $ combo <chr> "0", "0", "0", "0", "0"
## $ heronly <chr> "0", "0", "0", "0", "0"
## $ pharmonly <chr> "0", "0", "0", "0", "0"
## $ fentonly <chr> "1", "1", "1", "1", "1"
## $ Heroin <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ X6.mam <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Morphine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ hermor_nocod <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Codeine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cod.w.no.hermor <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ di.H.codeine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydromorphone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ oxymorphone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydrocodone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Oxycodone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Methadone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ bup <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentanyl..4.ANPP.too. <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ frankens <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent...frankens <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ tramadol <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ opioid.analogs..e.g...U47700. <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Other.Op <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma_nobupnometh <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ other <dbl> 0, 1, 0, 0, 0
## $ benzos <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cocaine <dbl> 0, 0, 1, 1, 0
## $ amphetamine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ EtOH <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 1, 1
## $ n <int> 9, 7, 6, 6, 5
The top 5 substance combinations for 2020 are:
## Rows: 5
## Columns: 31
## Groups: combo, her.only, pharm.only, fent.only, Heroin, X6.mam, Morphine, hermor_nocod, Codeine, cod.w.no.hermor, di.H.codeine, Hydromorphone, oxymorphone, Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, Methadone, bup, fentanyl..4.ANPP.despropionyl.fent.too., frankens, fent...frankens, tramadol, opioid.analogs.e.g.mitragynine, Other.Op, pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op, pharma_nobupnometh, other, benzos, cocaine, amphetamine..including.eutylone. [4]
## $ combo <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ her.only <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharm.only <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent.only <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ Heroin <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ X6.mam <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Morphine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ hermor_nocod <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cod.w.no.hermor <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ di.H.codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydromorphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ oxymorphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydrocodone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Oxycodone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Methadone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ bup <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentanyl..4.ANPP.despropionyl.fent.too. <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ frankens <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent...frankens <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ tramadol <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ opioid.analogs.e.g.mitragynine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Other.Op <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma_nobupnometh <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ other <int> 0, 1, 1, 0, 0
## $ benzos <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cocaine <int> 0, 0, 1, 1, 1
## $ amphetamine..including.eutylone. <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ EtOH <int> 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
## $ n <int> 14, 11, 10, 9, 7
The top 5 substance combinations for 2021 are:
## Rows: 5
## Columns: 31
## Groups: combo, her.only, pharm.only, fent.only, Heroin, X6.mam, Morphine, hermor_nocod, Codeine, cod.w.no.hermor, di.H.codeine, Hydro.morphone, oxy.morphone, Hydro.codone, Oxy.codone, Methadone, bup, fentanyl..4.ANPP.despropionyl.fent.too., frankens, fent...frankens, tramadol, opioid.analogs.e.g.mitragynine, Other.Op, pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op, pharma_nobupnometh, other, benzos, cocaine, amphetamine.including.eutylone.MDMA [4]
## $ combo <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ her.only <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharm.only <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent.only <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ Heroin <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ X6.mam <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Morphine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ hermor_nocod <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cod.w.no.hermor <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ di.H.codeine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydro.morphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ oxy.morphone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydro.codone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Oxy.codone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Methadone <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ bup <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentanyl..4.ANPP.despropionyl.fent.too. <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ frankens <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent...frankens <int> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ tramadol <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ opioid.analogs.e.g.mitragynine <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Other.Op <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma_nobupnometh <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ other <int> 1, 0, 1, 0, 0
## $ benzos <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cocaine <int> 1, 1, 0, 0, 0
## $ amphetamine.including.eutylone.MDMA <int> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ EtOH <int> 0, 1, 0, 1, 0
## $ n <int> 15, 14, 9, 8, 7
The top 5 substance combinations for 2022 are:
## Rows: 5
## Columns: 31
## Groups: combo, her.only, pharm.only, fent.only, Heroin, X6.mam, Morphine, hermor_nocod, Codeine, cod.w.no.hermor, di.H.codeine, Hydro.morphone, oxy.morphone, Hydro.codone, Oxy.codone, Methadone, bup, fentanyl..4.ANPP.despropionyl.fent.too., frankens, fent...frankens, tramadol, opioid.analogs.e.g.mitragynine, Other.Op, pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op, pharma_nobupnometh, other, benzos, cocaine, amphetamine.including.eutylone.MDMA [4]
## $ combo <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ her.only <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharm.only <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent.only <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ Heroin <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ X6.mam <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Morphine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ hermor_nocod <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Codeine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cod.w.no.hermor <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ di.H.codeine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydro.morphone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ oxy.morphone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Hydro.codone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Oxy.codone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Methadone <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ bup <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fentanyl..4.ANPP.despropionyl.fent.too. <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ frankens <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ fent...frankens <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
## $ tramadol <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ opioid.analogs.e.g.mitragynine <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ Other.Op <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma.w.meth.bup.no.fent.or.other.op <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ pharma_nobupnometh <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ other <dbl> 1, 0, 0, 0, 1
## $ benzos <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ cocaine <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 0, 0
## $ amphetamine.including.eutylone.MDMA <dbl> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
## $ EtOH <dbl> 0, 0, 1, 1, 0
## $ n <int> 22, 20, 9, 8, 6
The top 5 substance combinations for 2022 are:
This is based on request and should not be used for anything but a rough indication of chronic use. I identify chronic users crudely and approximately – I look for entries where the words “chronic” [can sometimes also indicate chronic pain, meaning opioid scripts], “Chronic”, “drug use”, “drug user”, “drug abuse”, “snort”, “snorts”, “addict”, “addicted”, “rehab”, or “sober house” pops up in either the notes field or immediate cause of death, because that generally means that the person had chronic drug use [based on my look at the data, I am including alcohol in chronic use].
## [1] "There were at least 15 people with suspected chronic use out of 97 decedents in 2018, which is 15.463918 percent of all decedents."
## [1] "There were at least 11 people with suspected chronic use out of 111 decedents in 2019, which is 9.909910 percent of all decedents."
## [1] "There were at least 34 people with suspected chronic use out of 146 decedents in 2020, which is 23.287671 percent of all decedents."
## [1] "There were at least 35 people with suspected chronic use out of 156 decedents in 2021, which is 22.435897 percent of all decedents."
## [1] "There were at least 78 people with suspected chronic use out of 154 decedents in 2022, which is 50.649351 percent of all decedents."
## [1] "There were at least 27 people with suspected chronic use out of 167 decedents in 2023, which is 16.167665 percent of all decedents."
Please note: this field and all fields explored below are only available in the data up to 2020.
Please note that this is an estimation based on the death narrative – it’s calculated as \(\text{Time last known alive} - \text{time when the body was found}\). The last known alive time is based on witness statements and may be an overestimation, especially in cases where friends and family had not seen the decedent in a number of weeks/months.
## [1] "There were 65 people found within 24 hours, which is 0.670103 of all decedents."
## [1] "There were 17 people found in over 24 hours, which is 0.175258 of all decedents."
## [1] "There were 86 people found within 24 hours, which is 0.774775 of all decedents."
## [1] "There were 10 people found in over 24 hours, which is 0.090090 of all decedents."
## [1] "There were 101 people found within 24 hours, which is 0.691781 of all decedents."
## [1] "There were 27 people found in over 24 hours, which is 0.184932 of all decedents."
Under 24h
Over 24h
Under 24h
Over 24h
Under 24h
Over 24h
You can view these images in a larger form by right clicking them and selecting “view image in new tab”.
Under 24h
Over 24h
Under 24h
Over 24h
Under 24h
Over 24h
Under 24h
Over 24h
Under 24h
Over 24h
Under 24h
Over 24h